Shop More Submit  Join Login
×



Details

Submitted on
October 7, 2008
Image Size
144 KB
Resolution
722×984
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
726
Favourites
5 (who?)
Comments
46
×
dA Logo relaunch by StephanusEmbricanus dA Logo relaunch by StephanusEmbricanus
A Logo is not fashion it is a mark that should be recognized also after a long period of time. Maybe it does not look very creative and very classic and traditional, what I have done here. But it is built on that's what is done before and shows some permanence and simplifies the reference, that looks official :)

New logo:
There is absolutely no need for, that would be contra-productive to an official image and absolute a bad idea: for the idea of the existing one is good and it is known, new Logo = lost of recognition
Changing and changing and changing a logo, that is not professional :D

this version is better for it is balanced

It is faster: no frames and no Schnickschnack!
It works in black and white as in colours also in smaller sizes as the existing one.

There is no need for a new CI I think!!!!
Add a Comment:
 
:iconred-spot:
red-spot Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2008  Professional Interface Designer
Can you tell me exactly what is different in comparison to the original logo? Cos I don't see it, sorry.
Reply
:iconbrightshade782:
brightshade782 Featured By Owner Oct 12, 2008
Thats sort of the point. there's no NEED for a new logo.
Reply
:iconstephanusembricanus:
StephanusEmbricanus Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2008
Maybe you can read? And look for details :)
Reply
:iconboffinbrain:
BoffinbraiN Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2008  Professional Interface Designer
I don't know why people are praising this. This is the new logo as designed by $liquisoft and you've hardly changed it at all. You can't call it your own.
Reply
:iconstephanusembricanus:
StephanusEmbricanus Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2008
This is a redesign of the existing logo, so there is nothing new, just something corrected. I didn't had a look what others are doing I just did the necessary maybe he did the same :) But now I saw his ideas, they look similar but they are different :) and they are also not new.
What we have common is, that we both understand the idea of a logo :)
Reply
:iconratafluke:
Ratafluke Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2008
The thing is that this one is the existing logo. You changed the new logo design.
Reply
:iconstephanusembricanus:
StephanusEmbricanus Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2008
Maybe my English is too bad but the logo-politics of deviant either for that is not the logo on top of this site :)
Reply
:iconratafluke:
Ratafluke Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2008
(Wir können auch gerne Deutsch reden.)

As you can see, the current logo comes in some variations. I suppose that's why `BoffinbraiN considers your deviation a variation of $liquisoft's design rather than your own work.
Reply
:iconstephanusembricanus:
StephanusEmbricanus Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2008
That's the problem a logo is a sign a sign should not have variations!!! As the company changed from Deutsch Bundesbahn to Deutsche Bahn a new logo was necessary but a sign was taken that had nearly no optical difference to the old one. :) That made sense. That got the prize and the amount was professional :)
The look of a logo has to be right designed and fit to the company and what the company is doing. But the use of the logo gives it strength and recognition and that makes it more official as designing logo after logo. The type I used as basics for my layouts was in use for some time I thought so I took it "as state of the art" (perhaps I'm wrong). Than someone should redesign the older one :)
But the logic stays the same :)
Reply
:iconboffinbrain:
BoffinbraiN Featured By Owner Oct 9, 2008  Professional Interface Designer
It's still far too similar to the original logo to be considered for the contest, though. Any changes you've made are barely noticeable.
Reply
Add a Comment: